Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Town of Aurora v. City of Aurora

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 24, 1991No. 2-91-0269PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woodward

The City of Aurora (City) passed an ordinance purporting to disconnect from its corporate limits a portion of property that it had annexed two years earlier. The plaintiffs, the Town of Aurora (Town) and Richard Hammond, as Town highway commissioner, brought an action in quo warranto and for a declaratory judgment, seeking a determination that the attempted “deannexation” was null and void and that the City retained responsibility for the repair and maintenance of portions of two streets adjacent to the purportedly “deannexed” territory.

The trial court ruled for plaintiffs, holding that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Punke v. Village of ElliottIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Vance v. RankinIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Woodward Governor Co. v. City of Loves ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  4. Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Village of Machesney ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. American Community Builders, Inc. v. City of Chicago HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Citizens for Conservation v. Village of Lake BarringtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Village of Montgomery v. Aurora TownshipAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. Village of Montgomery v. Aurora TownshipAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API