Department of Air Force v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA.
MIKVA, Circuit Judge:
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Federal Labor Relations Authority (“FLRA” or “Authority”) may direct federal agencies to pay travel expenses and per diems to their employees who are required to appear at FLRA proceedings. We find that these cases are controlled by Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms v. FLRA, 464 U.S. 89, 104 S.Ct. 439, 78 L.Ed.2d 195 (1983) (“BATF”), in which the Supreme Court held invalid a FLRA rule ordering federal agencies to pay travel expenses and per diems to employees…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- American Ship Building Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board Union v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Methodist Hospitals of Memphis v. SullivanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Department of the Air Force, Sacramento Air Logistics Center, McClellan Air Force Base, California v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio, Local 3854, Intervenor. Department of the Air Force, Headquarters Air Force Logistics Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. Air Force Logistics Command, McClellan Air Force Base, California v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989