Legal Opinion

Visintine v. Hannon-Egner

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 7, 2001No. 00-3999Published

1Opinion of the Court

Robert Steven Visintine, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se a district court order dismissing his civil rights action. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of *267the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Visintine filed a complaint against a probation officer and three attorneys who were appointed to represent him during criminal proceedings in 1992. Visintine was charged with nine counts each of armed bank robbery and using a firearm during a crime of violence. He…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health ClinicSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Lee Hampton v. Ron HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. James L. McCune v. The City of Grand Rapids, a Municipal Corporation Francis Pierce Gerald Steele John Doe and Richard RoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API