Hedrick v. Markham
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. (Dobleb, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The cause was argued before Boyd, O. J., Briscoe, Burke, Thomas, Pattisoe, Creer, Stockbrihge and CosSTABEE, J J.
1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.
The appellee sued out an attachment on the 27th of April, 1917, in the Superior Court of Baltimore City, against the appellant, a non-resident of the Stale, and it was. laid in the hands of the National Bank of Baltimore as garnishee1, and the bank was summoned.
On the 1st of Hay, 1917, the absent defendant appeared, and filed a petition under section 20 of Article 9 of the Code, for an immediate return of the writ before the return day, so as to permit a motion by him to quash and set aside the attachment and for an immediate hearing of the case. The prayer of the petition was granted, and on…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lee v. TingesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
- Bartlett v. WilburCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
- Downs v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- Stewart v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Dawson v. John A. Brown & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1841
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Butler v. TilghmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Gill v. Physicians & Surgeons BuildingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Sanitary Grocery Co. v. SoperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924