Starks v. Advantage Staffing, LLC
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
SECTION; “E” (5)
SUSIE MORGAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is the “Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Jones Act Seaman’s Status” by defendants Advantage Technical Resourcing, Inc., Advantage Human Resourcing, Inc., Archer Daniels Midland Company (“ADM”) and American River Transportation Co.(collectively “defendants”).1 Defendants contend that plaintiff Chedrick Starks (“Starks”) does not qualify as a seaman under the Jones Act. Starks has filed a memoranda in opposition to Defendants’ motion.2 The Court granted defendants leave to file a supplemental…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McDermott International, Inc. v. WilanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. PfeiferSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harbor Tug & Barge Co. v. PapaiSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Blanda v. Cooper/T. Smith CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2022
- Burton v. Weeks Marine IncDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2023
- Gage v. Canal Barge Company, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2020
- Phillips v. Javeler Marine Services, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2024