Legal Opinion

Powell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1917No. 5 Div. 260PublishedCited by 2 opinions

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 712, 2951%.] Appeal from Circuit .Court, Elmore County ; Leon McCord, Judge. W. A. Powell was convicted of an offense, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.

There is nothing in the statutes of this state that requires persons owning or having the possession of cattle infected with or exposed to ticks to dip such cattle in “a standard arsenical solution” after notice. Curlee v. State, ante, p. 62, 75 South. 268.

While the statute (Code 1907, § 758), confers upon the state live stock sanitary board power to enact “such rules and regulations as they may deem necessary for governing the movement, transportation, or disposition of live stock that may be quarantined * * * on account of being affected with, or exposed to,” contagious or communicable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  2. Emmonds v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Curlee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Childs v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Pierson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API