Legal Opinion

Pierson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1917No. 2 Div. 167PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dallas County ;• J. B. Evans, Judge. William T. Pierson was convicted of moving cattle from a quarantined district into a non-*. quarantined district, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, J.

The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted under section 7083 of the Code, as amended by Acts 1911, p. 613, prohibiting the moving of cattle from a quarantined district into a nonquarantined district. The first and third counts of the indictment follow the verbiage of the statute and are sufficient. McLain v. State, 72 South. 511. Counts 2 and 4 fail to aver that Chilton eounty or Dallas county were in a quarantined district, but the demurrers to these counts are not based upon these grounds. The demurrers were properly overruled. State v. McCarty, 5 Ala. App. 212, 59 South. 543;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morgan's Steamship Co. v. Louisiana Board of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Ryan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. State v. McCartyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Curlee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Glenn v. City of PrattvilleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Singleton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Worrell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API