Legal Opinion
Royal Indemnity Co. v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 11, 2003PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered December 30, 2002, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss defendants-respondents’. fifth counterclaim, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion granted and the fifth counterclaim dismissed.
Plaintiffs are umbrella and excess liability insurers that have issued policies to defendants Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., Salomon Smith Barney Holdings, Inc., and Citigroup, Inc. (collectively, the insureds). In this action, plaintiffs seek a declaration that they are not obligated to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Bettan v. Geico General InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Terio v. Ford Motor CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Makastchian v. Oxford Health Plans, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by11 opinions
- Zawahir v. Berkshire Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Ebrahimian v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Alexander v. Geico InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- TN Metro Holdings I, LLC v. Commonwealth InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Chisom v. Columbia Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.