Brown v. Goodyear
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Holt county. Tried below before Norris, J. cited: Brondberg v. Babbott, 14 Neb., 517; Freeman v. Burks, 16 Id., 328; Cleghorn v. Waterman, Id., 226. cited: Newlove v. Woodward, 9 Neb., 502; Crowell v. Galloway, 3 Id., 220; Dunn v. Haines, 17 Id., 563.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
In July, 1888, the plaintiffs brought an action against the defendant in the county court of Holt county, and a summons was duly issued in said cause. On the return day thereof the defendant, appeared and filed a motion as follows: “Comes now the defendant and moves the court to quash the writ in the above case for the reason that no certified copy of the summons therein has been served on the defendant as by law required.” This motion was supported by the following affidavit; “S. P. Goodyear, of lawful age, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the defendant in the above…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Freeman v. BurksNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ada-Konawa Bridge Co. v. CargoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Wendt v. Yant Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933
- Streby v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Bankers' Surety Co. v. Town of HollyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Hermann v. HutchesonOregon Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.