Commonwealth v. Dane Entertainment Services, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
1. Essential terms used in G. L. c. 272, § 31, as amended by St. 1977; c. 917, §§ 4-6 (“patently offensive,” “prurient interest,” and “contemporary standards of the Commonwealth”), are not inherently vague by reason of any increasing permissiveness which may exist in contemporary society. See Commonwealth v. United Books, Inc., 389 Mass. 888, 891-893 (1983); Commonwealth v. Dane Entertainment Serv., Inc., (No. 1), 389 Mass. 902, 904-906 (1983).
2. The validity of the rule that the Commonwealth need not introduce evidence on the elements of obscenity but instead may rely on the allegedly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HobbsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. United Books, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. DeagleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. PlankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth vs. Dane Entertainment Services, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AllenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. Dane Entertainment Services, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Commonwealth v. Dane Entertainment Services, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987