Legal Opinion

Hackney v. Welsh

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1886No. 13,131PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellant petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging, in his petition, that he was unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the appellee; that the cause of his restraint was an arrest under a warrant issued by the Governor of Indiana upon a requisition from the Governor of Michigan; that the restraint is illegal in this, that he is a resident of the State of Ohio, and in September, 1885, was arrested by authority of a warrant issued by the Governor of that State upon a requisition from the Governor of Indiana; that this requisition was issued upon an indictment returned by the grand…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ReggelSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Ker v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Adriance v. . LagraveNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. In re CannonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. State v. WenzelIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re WhittingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. Musgrave v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State v. SaundersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. State Ex Rel. Brown v. GroschTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Ex Parte InnesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API