Legal Opinion

Gantt v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 7, 1994No. 718, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

The question posed on this appeal is whether the trial court can modify a sentence more than ninety days after its imposition where the sentence was to run consecutively to a federal sentence that the defendant was serving on parole and the parole was not revoked as the court had anticipated.

FACTS and PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Appellant, Andre A. Gantt, is no stranger to this Court. On March 22-23, 1989 appellant was tried by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. At the time of appellant’s conviction, he was on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Berwyn Fuel & Feed Co. v. KolbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  2. Weitz v. MacKenzieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Hughes v. Beltway Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Autobahn Motors, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Gantt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoile v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Minger v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Davis v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. McGhie v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API