Legal Opinion

Gil-De La Madrid v. Bowles Custom Pools & Spa

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 25, 2016No. 14-2340PPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from a dispute whether the bankruptcy court erred in enlarging time for a creditor to file an unsecured claim. Appellant Julio Enrique Gil-De La Madrid, debtor to Appellee Bowles Custom Pool & Spa, appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s decision to permit Bowles to file an unsecured claim after the initial statutory ninety-day deadline from the date of the initial creditors’ meeting had passed. 1 Because this deadline fell in a period between the case’s dismissal and subsequent reinstatement, the bankruptcy court reset the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. DowdellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  4. Donarumo v. Furlong (In Re Furlong)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. Natasha, Inc. v. Evita Marine Charters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steyr Arms, Inc. v. SIG SauerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
  2. Jose Luis Orosco and Vivian Garcia OroscoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2020
  3. Shionta Shanell SomervilleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  4. Steyr Arms, Inc. v. Sig Sauer, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API