Legal Opinion
Steyr Arms, Inc. v. SIG Sauer
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided April 23, 2020No. 17-cv-483-JDPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Steyr Arms, Inc. v. Civil No. 17-cv-483-JD Opinion No.
2020 DNH 068
SIG Sauer O R D E R Steyr Arms, Inc. brought suit, alleging that Sig Sauer, Inc. is infringing
U.S. Patent No. 6,260,301
(“‘301 Patent”), which Steyr owns. The court granted SIG Sauer’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement, and judgment was entered dismissing the case. SIG Sauer now moves for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs that SIG Sauer incurred following the court’s claim construction order issued on December 19, 2018. Steyr objects to an award of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Sánchez-Rodríguez v. AT & T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Steyr Arms, Inc. v. Sig Sauer, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020