Legal Opinion

Kelly v. City of Niagara Falls

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.

This action is brought by plaintiff to recover his damages for personal injuries received by him when he was struck by an automobile owned by defendant, and by defendant provided for the use of defendant’s police officers in the performance of their duties, which automobile was at the time of the accident being operated on the streets of defendant by one of defendant’s police officers then on duty. Plaintiff alleges that the accident was caused solely by the negligence of such police officer, which for the purposes of this motion, must be accepted as the fact.

Defendant moves to dismiss the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McCluskey v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Rowell v. . JanvrinNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Ham v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Fluegel v. CoudertNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Brown v. Mayor of WilmingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lacock v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  2. Kaplan v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1950
  3. Irolla v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API