Legal Opinion

Sun Oil Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1993No. 418 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Sun Oil Company (Employer) petitions for review of the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) dated January 31, 1992, affirming the decision of the referee granting temporary total disability benefits to Joseph Ford (Claimant). The sole issue on appeal is whether the Board erred in affirming the referee’s conclusion that Claimant properly notified Employer of his disability pursuant to section 311 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act). 1 We affirm. 2

The relevant factual and procedural history is as follows. Claimant worked at Employer’s oil…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Plasteel Products Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Padilla v. Chain Bike Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Hammer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Marcucci v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Gaff v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kocher's IGA v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Jamieson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Storer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. US Airways v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Panyko)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API