Legal Opinion

Stuck v. Aikens

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided February 22, 1991No. S90-409PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MILLER, District Judge.

An inmate contends that his transfer, through no fault of his own, to a prison with greater security and restrictions violated his constitutional rights. The various state and prison officials that he has sued have moved for dismissal or summary judgment. The plaintiff has filed his response, supporting affidavit, and exhibits in opposition to the motion. As per its order of October 25, 1990, this court will treat the motion as one for summary judgment as a matter of law.

I

Plaintiff Fred Stuck is an inmate at the Indiana State Prison (“ISP”), serving…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peden v. BanksDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
  2. William E. Ross v. Indiana Department of Corrections, Frank Vanihel Warden of Wabash Valley Correctional FacilityDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API