Blue Tee Corp. v. Koehring Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Petitioner Blue Tee Corp. (“Blue Tee”) has petitioned, pursuant to § 9 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 9 (the “Act”), to confirm an arbitration award rendered on March 30, 1990. Respondents Koehring Company (“Koehring”) and AMCA International Corporation (“AMCA”) have moved pursuant to § 10(d) of the Act and Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., for an order dismissing the Petition with prejudice and vacating the findings of the Arbitrator. Blue Tee has also moved for sanctions against respondent pursuant to Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P. For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Andros Compania Maritima, S.A., as Disponent Owners of the Kissavos, and Marc Rich & Co., A.G., as CharterersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Calloway v. Marvel Entertainment GroupCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Diapulse Corporation of America v. Carba, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- In Re the Arbitration Between Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. Star Lines Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Andrea Doreen, Ltd. v. Building Material Local Union 282District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- In Re Arbitration Between Interdigital Communications Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Blue Tee Corp. v. Koehring Company and United Dominion Industries, Inc., (Formerly Known as Amca International Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- St. Lawrence Explosives Corp. v. Worthy Bros. Pipeline Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Blue Tee Corp. v. Koehring Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.