Legal Opinion

Shefler v. City of Geneva

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1956PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames C. O’Brien, J.

Plaintiffs own and reside on property in defendant City of Geneva. In December, 1953, the city enacted a new zoning ordinance (hereinafter referred to as the “ 1953 ordinance ”), which altered the boundaries of the use district in which plaintiffs reside and changed the uses of property permitted in that district. Plaintiffs contend that this ordinance is invalid and should be struck down.

The first ground of attack is that defendant was required to and did not give public notice and hold a hearing on the proposed changes made by the 1953 ordinance.

Prior to the enactment of the 1953 ordinance…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Merritt v. . Village of PortchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Seligman v. . FriedlanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Betz v. HorrNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Village of Mill Neck v. NolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  5. Village of Mill Neck v. NolanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Desloge v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Brechner v. INC. VIL. OF LAKE SUCCESSSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  3. Kalakowski v. Town of ClarendonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  4. Blumberg v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  5. Albini v. StancoNew York Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API