Legal Opinion

Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 1931No. Docket No. 7473PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The petitioner is the insurance carrier of the “San Francisco Chronicle,” a daily newspaper. The state compensation insurance fund is the insurance carrier of the “San Francisco Examiner.” John L. Du Grosse was employed by the “Examiner” to sell its newspapers on a designated street corner in the city and county of San Francisco. At the same time he was engaged in selling copies of the ‘ ‘ San Francisco Chronicle. ’ ’ While so employed he suffered an injury for which he was compensated by an award of the respondent Commission which found both newspapers equally liable as his employers. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. New York Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Birmingham Post Co. v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Creswell v. Charlotte News Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Associated Indem. Corp. v. Indus. Accident Comm.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Associated Indem. Corp. v. Indus. Accident Comm.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API