Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
The petitioner is the insurance carrier of the “San Francisco Chronicle,” a daily newspaper. The state compensation insurance fund is the insurance carrier of the “San Francisco Examiner.” John L. Du Grosse was employed by the “Examiner” to sell its newspapers on a designated street corner in the city and county of San Francisco. At the same time he was engaged in selling copies of the ‘ ‘ San Francisco Chronicle. ’ ’ While so employed he suffered an injury for which he was compensated by an award of the respondent Commission which found both newspapers equally liable as his employers. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- New York Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by7 opinions
- Birmingham Post Co. v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Creswell v. Charlotte News Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Associated Indem. Corp. v. Indus. Accident Comm.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Associated Indem. Corp. v. Indus. Accident Comm.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.