Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Guralnick

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 8, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

The defendant Guralnick appeals from a denial by a Superior Court judge of his motion concerning the method of computation of interest on a jury verdict entered in a civil tort action. During jury deliberations, the attorneys for the plaintiff and the defendant Albert notified the court and Gural nick’s attorney that they had orally entered into a settlement agreement. 3 Later that day, the jury returned a verdict in the sum of $375,000 for the plaintiff against both defendants. The only dispute in this case concerns whether the amount of the settlement should be deducted from the jury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Booth v. Mary Carter Paint CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  2. Tritsch v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Boston Edison Co. v. TritschMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goulet v. Whitin MacHine Works, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Kippenhan v. Chaulk Services, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. MacCuish v. Volkswagenwerk A. G.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  4. Morea v. Cosco, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. Harvey v. Essex Bancorp, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API