Franklin v. Guralnick
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
The defendant Guralnick appeals from a denial by a Superior Court judge of his motion concerning the method of computation of interest on a jury verdict entered in a civil tort action. During jury deliberations, the attorneys for the plaintiff and the defendant Albert notified the court and Gural nick’s attorney that they had orally entered into a settlement agreement. 3 Later that day, the jury returned a verdict in the sum of $375,000 for the plaintiff against both defendants. The only dispute in this case concerns whether the amount of the settlement should be deducted from the jury…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Booth v. Mary Carter Paint CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Tritsch v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Boston Edison Co. v. TritschMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Goulet v. Whitin MacHine Works, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Kippenhan v. Chaulk Services, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- MacCuish v. Volkswagenwerk A. G.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Morea v. Cosco, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Harvey v. Essex Bancorp, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.