Legal Opinion
Zandt v. Desdemona Independent School Dist.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 5, 1926No. Nos. 118, 119PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPannill, C. J.
The questions arising in the appeals of both the above-styled cases, are the same! and the issues have been fully stated in the case of Edwards Manufacturing Comi>any v. Southern Surety Company, 283 S. W. 624, this day decided.
In these cases the Southern Surety Company pleaded the one-year statute of limitation. Appellants seek to avoid the bar of the one-year statute of limitation prescribed by article 6394h on tw'o grounds: The first is that their suit is not iby virtue of the statute, but is a suit on the common-law action arising from provisions of the bond, and that, therefore, their…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trinity Portland Cement Co. v. Lion Bonding & Surety Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Travelers' Ins. Co. of Hartford v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Scarbrough v. AlcornTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Edwards Mfg. Co. v. Southern Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Foust v. BibbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. StuardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Prassel Sash & Door Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- American Indemnity Co. v. YochamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Edwards Mfg. Co. v. Southern Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.