Quackenbush v. Reed
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Marin County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage dated December 8, 1887, executed by Hugh Boyle, now deceased. Defendant Carmelita Natividad Boyle is the widow of Hugh Boyle, and was the wife of the decedent at the time of the execution of the mortgage, April 29, 1872. She, being then the wife of Hugh Boyle, made a declaration of homestead, which was in due form and properly acknowledged and duly filed for record in the recorder’s office of Marin county, where the property is situated, in which the mortgaged premises were claimed as a homestead. The mortgage was executed by the husband…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sanders v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Southwick v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Schuyler v. BroughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Ornbaum v. His CreditorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by6 opinions
- Taylor v. MadiganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Perry v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Yerrick v. HigginsMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- Rauh v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Edwards v. SimmsArizona Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.