Legal Opinion

Hill Farm, Inc. v. Hill County

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1968No. 4688PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILSON, Justice.

Summary judgment was rendered requiring appellant to remove a pipeline from the right-of-way of a public county road. The petition for mandatory injunction on behalf of Hill County alleged appellant, without legal right, dug a ditch in a described right-of-way within which it laid and maintained the line, refusing to remove it. Appellant answered that the line was laid “with the oral consent of the County Commissioner of the precinct”; that the County had waived the right to object to its location, and is estopped to assert it is not legally located. ■

In response to the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Canales v. LaughlinTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Robbins v. Limestone CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  3. City of San Antonio v. Pigeonhole Parking of Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Rolison v. PuckettTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  5. State v. GoodnightTexas Supreme Court · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Guynes v. Galveston CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hill Farm, Inc. v. Hill CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Renfro v. ShropshireCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Graff v. Whittle, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
  5. Eastex Wildlife Conservation Ass'n v. JASPER, ETC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API