Legal Opinion

Ellsworth v. Lord

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 8, 1889PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Winona county, Start, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

The plaintiff is the owner of a flouring-mill and *338appurtenances upon Eolling Stone creek in the town of Eolling Stone, Winona county. Extending across the creek, and over and upon the dam of plaintiff, is a wagon-crossing open to the public, and running to and beyond the plaintiff’s mill, and connecting with public highways on each side of the creek, north and south. Whether this travelled way has become a public road and a part of one continuous highway across and beyond the creek, by reason of the dedication of the same for public use as a highway, was the principal issue to be determined…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morse v. ZeizeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Skjeggerud v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Whitesides v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Gilbert v. EmersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. L. Realty Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  4. Security Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. C & C Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. People v. FossMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API