Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 6, 1983No. 82-AB1341; CA A25528PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

This is an unemployment compensation case. Petitioner, a registered nurse who was employed by respondent Good Samaritan Hospital (the employer) as a staff development specialist, was advised that, due to budget cuts, she would be required to devote a portion of her time to doing clinical work and direct patient care. She resigned, claiming that she is so allergic to the sterile and non-sterile gloves worn in staff nursing that she cannot do clinical work. Her subsequent claim for unemployment compensation benefits was approved by both an administrative decision and, after a hearing, a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bremer v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allen v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Dooley v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API