Comer v. Moore & Co.

Appellants as plaintiffs below brought this action for an accounting and to establish their title to certain real estate; and from a judgment denying them any relief, entered at the close of their case in chief, they appeal.

*62The facts, as they appear from the testimony offered on behalf of the appellants, about which there is no substantial dispute, are, in the main, as follows: One Nettie E. Burling was the owner in fee of the property in controversy, subject to a mortgage in favor of Moore & Company. On September 11, 1917, a. decree of foreclosure was duly entered in the superior court for…