Legal Opinion
Sidwell & Co. v. Kamchatimpex
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1995PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herman Cahn, J.
Plaintiff moves for an attachment of funds deposited in a certain account maintained by nonparty Kamchatsky Agnoprombank Russia (KAR) at nonparty Citibank, N. A. (Citibank). KAR and Citibank challenge plaintiffs motion for an attachment and seek vacatur of a temporary restraining order (TRO) entered by this court (Saxe, J.) and thereafter continued by this court (Cahn, J.) pending decision.
The facts in this action have been stated in the court’s previous decision of September 29, 1994 and need only brief reiteration here. Plaintiff is an English corporation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Siegel v. Northern Boulevard & 80th Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Elton Leather Corp. v. First General Resources Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Ray v. Jama Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- ERA Management, Inc. v. Morrison Cohen Singer & WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- U.R.C., Inc. v. Applied Images, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sigmoil, Resources, N.V. v. Pan Ocean Oil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Bank of New York v. NickelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Mitchell v. Lyons Professional Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Palestine Monetary Authority v. StrachmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Considar, Inc. v. Redi Corp. EstablishmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.