Siegel v. Northern Boulevard & 80th Street Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCapozzoli, J.
This action was brought to recover damages resulting from warrants of attachment which were obtained by defendants-appellants and which were later vacated by this court on the ground that they were not authorized by statute. (Northern Blvd. & 80th St. Corp. v. Siegel, 16 A D 2d 523.) The plaintiff contends that he is not limited by the amount specified in .the undertaking. His position is that this is an action in the nature of trespass and that the defendant is obligated to pay whatever damages are found to have been sustained by the plaintiff without reference to the undertaking.
Attachment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fischer v. . LangbeinNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Day v. . BachNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Penoyar v. . KelseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Kerr v. . MountNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Lyon v. YatesNew York Supreme Court · 1868
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Brastex Corporation v. Allen International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- University Mews Associates v. JeanmarieNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- First National Bank v. Highland Hardwoods, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Reading & Bates Corp. v. National Iranian Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Ashland Oil, Inc. v. GleaveDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.