Legal Opinion

Thurman v. Thurman

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 28, 1995No. CA 94-732PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James R. Cooper, Judge.

This is a chancery case arising out of a family settlement agreement. Cecil and Margie Thurman had 198 acres of real estate which they divided into four 40-acre tracts, leaving a 38-acre homestead. They sold the timber from two tracts, then deeded them to their sons, Curtis and Larry. Their other sons, DeWayne and Dennis, received 40-acre tracts with the timber intact. Cecil was paid approximately $29,000 for the timber, and placed these proceeds in a joint account with Margie. Cecil died intestate, and all the property went to Margie by operation of law. Margie put her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ellison v. TubbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Dziga v. Muradian Business Brokers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Jones v. BalentineCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hagans v. HainesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Machen v. MachenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Development & Construction Management, Inc. v. City of North Little RockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Green v. McAuleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Shea v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API