Legal Opinion
McKesson v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 17, 1923No. 2186PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
This appeal attacks the validity of an appraisement and reap-praisement of nine cases of merchandise imported at the port of New York. Pour of the cases imported May 4, 1920, on the Michigan contained hair brushes, military hair brushes, Harper’s hair brushes, nail brushes, bath brushes, and tooth brushes of various kinds, grades, and designs. Of this shipment, case No. 19, containing only some of the grades of hair brushes, military hair brushes, nail brushes, bath brushes, and tooth brushes, was sent to the appraiser’s stores. With the exception of the grade of hair brushes marked G241S and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Greely's Administrator v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Loeb v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Gibb v. WashingtonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1858
- Burgess v. ConverseU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1855
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carey v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. McConnaughey & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. Michelson & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- United States v. KuyperCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. Rolls-Royce of America (Inc.)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.