Legal Opinion

United States v. Michelson & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 17, 1924No. 2369PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barber, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court;

This case involves numerous importations of tomatoes in the raw state at Miami, Fla., under the tariff act of 1913.

Whether or not the tomatoes were appraised by a local appraiser (the importers assert they were not) is a question the determination of which probably depends upon the authority of the officer assuming to make such appraisal so to do, but this question we do not consider for reasons hereinafter appearing.

The person acting as local appraiser seems to have approved the entered value, and assuming such appraisement to have been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKesson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. Loeb v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. United States v. ScanlanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carey v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. La Manna v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. McConnaughey & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. United States v. KuyperCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. United States v. Rolls-Royce of America (Inc.)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API