Legal Opinion
Cox v. General Electric Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided January 10, 1955No. 18791PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Presiding Justice.
It is contended that the plaintiff in the court below (the defendant in error here) is entitled to the relief sought in so far as counts one and two are concerned irrespective of the Fair Trade Statute for the reason as contended, that the petition seeks to protect property rights, and that the petitioner is entitled to have these property rights protected irrespective of the Fair Trade Act. This contention can not be sustained. The Supreme Court of the United States in Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, 340 U. S. 211, (71 Sup. Ct. 259, 95 L. ed. 219), in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Harris v. DuncanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Grayson-Robinson Stores Inc. v. Oneida Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1953
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. OppermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Bulova Watch Co. v. Zale Jewelry Co. of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
- Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. White River Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- General Electric Co. v. Kimball Jewelers, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.