Legal Opinion

Bobst v. Bobst

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1946No. Appeal, 48PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

The court below approved the report of the master, and decreed a divorce upon the husband’s charge of indignities.

Although duly notified, the respondent did not appear, nor was she represented, at the master’s original hearing. After she received notice of the master’s report recommending the decree and the final rule, she petitioned the court to reopen the case and permit her to enter a defense. Several causes, illness, imprudent advice, and her own conviction that her husband’s case was without merit and would not support a divorce — the last was doubtless the moving…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Esenwein v. EsenweinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Breene v. BreeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Richards v. RichardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  4. Kindt v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Mathias v. MathiasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bobst v. BobstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Coxe v. CoxeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Miller v. HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Walper v. WalperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Benny v. BennySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API