McNamara v. Eustis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Aitkin and Itasca counties, Holland, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of $137.68 for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This was an action brought to recover for services alleged to have been performed for defendants as copartners. Defend*312ant Fraser failed to answer. Defendants Eustis, Neal, and Carr answered separately, each denying the alleged partnership and the performance of the services mentioned in the complaint, but a verdict was rendered against them upon the trial. The appeal is from an order denying a new trial..
1. The district court did not err when refusing to grant the motion for a change of place of trial made by the answering defendants. As Fraser resided in Itasca county, the action was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sullivan v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Waldron v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
3Cited by3 opinions
- McDonald v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Potter v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Miller v. Anchor Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951