University of the Incarnate Word v. Redus
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
Jason Pulliam, Justice
University of the Incarnate Word (UIW) brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order' denying its plea to the jurisdiction. In its plea to the jurisdiction, UIW asserted the trial court is without subject matter jurisdiction because UIW is entitled to governmental immunity. On appeal, the Redus plaintiffs (the Reduses) filed a motion to dismiss contending this court lacks interlocutory jurisdiction. We dismiss UIW’s interlocutory appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Facts and Procedural History
It is undisputed that UIW is a private…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Texas a & M University System v. KoseogluTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Texas Lottery Commission v. First State Bank of DeQueenTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- America Online, Inc. v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- University of the Incarnate Word v. RedusTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- University of Incarnate Word v. Valerie RedusTexas Supreme Court · 2020