Legal Opinion
Gunther v. Metropolitan Cas. Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 5, 1954PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
33 N.J. Super. 101 (1954)
109 A.2d 485
MONROE GUNTHER AND MADELINE GUNTHER, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
METROPOLITAN CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided November 5, 1954.
Mr. Harold D. Feuerstein, attorney for plaintiffs.
Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Foster (Mr. Charles S. Barrett, Jr., appearing), attorneys for defendant.
GAULKIN, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
Plaintiffs contend that, upon the proper construction of the insurance policy sued upon, they are entitled to summary judgment.
The facts are not in dispute. Plaintiffs' part-time…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Keeney v. BeasmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Schneider v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Fields v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Herbert L. Farkas Co. v. New York Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Prather v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Elcar Mobile Homes, Inc. v. DK Baxter, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Zurich American Insurance v. Keating Building Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. v. FalcianiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Michigan Mutual Liability Company v. MattoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Caldwell v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.