Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Moreno-Santana

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 24, 1975No. 44008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

322 So.2d 13 (1975)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner,

v.

Arturo Dominador MORENO-SANTANA, Respondent.

No. 44008.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 24, 1975.

R. Layton Mank, Miami, Leonard Rivkind, Miami Beach, David W. Walters, Miami, Clifford L. Davis, Asst. Staff Counsel, and Richard C. McFarlain, Asst. Director, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Arturo Dominador Moreno-Santana, in pro per.

2Per curiam

This cause is before us on the petition of The Florida Bar filed pursuant to Article XVI of the Integration Rule and charging Respondent with the unauthorized practice of law. Article II, Section 2, of the Integration Rule…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. SperrySupreme Court of Florida · 1962

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Unauthorized Practice Committee, State Bar of Texas v. CortezTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. The Florida Bar v. MatusSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Florida Bar v. PennSupreme Court of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API