Floyd v. Title Exchange and Pawn of Anniston, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether a person can pawn an automobile certificate of title and retain possession of the automobile. The answer depends on whether the legislature intended an automobile certificate of title to be "tangible personal property," within the meaning of the Alabama Pawnshop Act1 enacted in 1992.
The supervisor of the Bureau of Loans of the State Banking Department took the position that the business transaction was not a "pawn transaction," but was a small loan transaction governed by the provisions of Alabama's Small Loan Act. The trial court held that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pagliarulo v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ex Parte ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Austin v. Alabama Check Cashers Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Blackmon v. DowneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- In re JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
- In Re SCHWALBUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.