Legal Opinion
Osman v. Isotec, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 26, 1997No. C-3-96-371PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL
DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Partial Dismissal (doc. # 8). For reasons more fully explained below, the Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
I. BACKGROUND
The following description summarizes the facts as presented in the Plaintiffs complaint.
On or about October 5, 1994, the Defendants hired the Plaintiff as a temporary worker through a temporary employment agency. On or about January 3, 1995, the Defendants’ hired the Plaintiff as a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Richard G. Lawler v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt. Dunn, Captain McAlister Lieutenant Dunn, Officer Boehm, Officer Paul AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. United Dairy FarmersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
- Dalton v. Jefferson Smurfit Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
- Dodge v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Jackson v. City of ColumbusDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998