Legal Opinion

Waltz v. Noble

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1919No. 9,797PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Hamilton Circuit Court; Willett PL. Parr, Special Judge. Action by Peter D. Waltz and others against George Noble and others, in which the defendants filed a cross-complaint. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

The appellants filed their complaint to quiet their title to one-half of the real estate in controversy and for partition. The appellees filed a cross-complaint claiming to own the whole of the real estate and asking that their title be quieted against appellants. The issues being closed, the cause was tried by a jury, and resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of appellees, quieting their title to the whole of the real estate.

Appellants filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and the errors assigned in this court and not waived are that the court erred (1) in overruling the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stanley v. SutherlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Treschman v. TreschmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Hutchins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Abney v. Indiana Union Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shriner v. Union Federal Sav. and Loan Assoc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API