Legal Opinion

Gray v. Handy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 25, 1965PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.

This is a petition under G. L. c. 185 to register title to certain land, hereinafter called the locus. The respondents claim, inter alla, “the right to remove sand from the . . . [locus] for purposes of cranberry culture on the bogs lying southwest . . . [thereof].” The Land Court ruled, inter alla, that the petitioners “are entitled to have the . . . [locus] registered free from any . . . right of the respondents to dig and remove any sand therefrom”; and the respondents appealed. The evidence is reported.

We summarize the pertinent facts from the Land Court’s decision. Much of the locus and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stockbridge Iron Co. v. Hudson Iron Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. White v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Bessey v. OllmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Hunt v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  5. Nelson v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commercial Wharf East Condominium Ass'n v. Waterfront Parking Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Connerty v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Borek Cranberry Marsh, Inc. v. Jackson CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. M. & I. TIMBER CO. v. Hope Silver-Lead Mines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. First National Bank of Boston v. KonnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API