Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of Iowa v. Dale Dean Pettijohn Jr.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 30, 2017No. 14–0830Published

1DissentWaterman, Justice

I respectfully dissent and would affirm Dale Dean Pettrjohn Jr.’s conviction for drunken boating. The majority correctly 'holds that Officer William Wineland lawfully stopped the boat Pettijohn was operating on Saylorville Lake and that Petti-john’s warrantless breath test to measure his blood alcohol level satisfied the Fourth Amendment. The majority also correctly rejects Pettijohn’s theory that his “natural right” to use Iowa waterways limits the State’s power to criminalize drunken boating as it criminalizes drunken driving on Iowa roads. But I part company with the. majority’s…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. GrubbsSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API