Legal Opinion

Saul v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 1964No. 3450Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge.

Appellant Saul, an attorney, was engaged by a Mrs. Coker and her minor daughter to represent the daughter in a personal injury claim on a contingent fee basis. Saul made some efforts toward a settlement with the insurance carrier of the alleged tort-feasor. These efforts failed and he filed an action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. About a year later the Cokers became dissatisfied with Saul’s representation and wrote him a letter discharging him from further representation. They then engaged another attorney, one Noone, who shortly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. WinchellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1921
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. Pink v. FarringtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  4. Barnes v. QuigleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Sachs v. KleinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API