Saul v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge.
Appellant Saul, an attorney, was engaged by a Mrs. Coker and her minor daughter to represent the daughter in a personal injury claim on a contingent fee basis. Saul made some efforts toward a settlement with the insurance carrier of the alleged tort-feasor. These efforts failed and he filed an action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. About a year later the Cokers became dissatisfied with Saul’s representation and wrote him a letter discharging him from further representation. They then engaged another attorney, one Noone, who shortly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kellogg v. WinchellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1921
- Continental Casualty Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Pink v. FarringtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Barnes v. QuigleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Sachs v. KleinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959