United States v. Leach
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, District Judge.
After careful consideration of the motion for a new trial and of the entire record in the cause, including the indictment, I have reached the conclusion that, aside from any other question involved, the indictment is so defective in its allegations that it fails to charge any offense cognizable in this court.
The statute on which the government relies is the so-called Harrison Anti-Narcotic Law (the act of Congress of December 17, 1914, c. 1, 38 Statutes at Large, 785 [Comp. St. §§ 6287g-6287q]). Section 1 of that act provides, among other things, that “every person who…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. BehrmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hardesty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Shilter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
- Cohn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. WatersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1947
- United States v. WatersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Kidder v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
- Gingerich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1948