Nebraska National Bank v. Pennock
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county.Tried below before Slabaugh, J.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This is the second appearance of the cause in this court, the opinion on the former hearing being reported in 55 Nebr., 188. Subsequent to the entry of the judgment of reversal a new trial was had in the court below, which terminated in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $91.41. The bank prosecutes a petition in error.
The defendant below has filed a motion to quash the bill of exceptions for the reason that the motion for a new trial was' not filed by the plaintiff in the court below within three days after the decision was rendered. This motion is not well taken and must be…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Joiner v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Carmack v. ErdenbergerNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Riely v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Tully v. Grand Island Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910
- Dobesh v. Associated Asphalt Contractors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.