Smith v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER FROM THE INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS, NO. 64A03-08306-CR-204.
SULLIVAN, Justice.
Defendant Maurice K. Smith's sentence in this case was increased by 10 years because the trial court found him to be a "repeat sexual offender." He contends that the Indiana and United States Constitutions require a jury determination of repeat sexual offender status before such an enhancement may be imposed. We affirm the trial court's decision. Smith's rights under Article I, Section 19, of the Indiana Constitution are not implicated because the Legislature has not committed the determination…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Morgan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Walden v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Hunter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Christopher Jerome Harris v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2023
- Robert J. Maxie v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.