Via Metropolitan Transit v. Curtis Meck
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ NO. 18-0458 ════════════ VIA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT, PETITIONER, v. CURTIS MECK, RESPONDENT ════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS ════════════════════════════════════════════════════ CHIEF JUSTICE HECHT, joined by JUSTICE GUZMAN, JUSTICE DEVINE, and JUSTICE BLAND, concurring. The common law rule that common carriers owe their passengers a high degree of care “that would be exercised by a very cautious and prudent person under the same or similar…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hood v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Mount Pleasant Independent School District v. Estate of Lindburg Ex Rel. LindburgTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Union Traction Co. v. BerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. BankstonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Galveston City Railroad v. HewittTexas Supreme Court · 1887
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.