Legal Opinion

Via Metropolitan Transit v. Curtis Meck

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2020No. 18-0458Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ NO. 18-0458 ════════════ VIA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT, PETITIONER, v. CURTIS MECK, RESPONDENT ════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS ════════════════════════════════════════════════════ CHIEF JUSTICE HECHT, joined by JUSTICE GUZMAN, JUSTICE DEVINE, and JUSTICE BLAND, concurring. The common law rule that common carriers owe their passengers a high degree of care “that would be exercised by a very cautious and prudent person under the same or similar…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hood v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Mount Pleasant Independent School District v. Estate of Lindburg Ex Rel. LindburgTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Union Traction Co. v. BerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. BankstonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  5. Galveston City Railroad v. HewittTexas Supreme Court · 1887

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API