Legal Opinion
Dayhoff Inc. v. H.J. Heinz Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 24, 1996No. 95-3404, 96-3250UnknownCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1289OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Appellant Dayhoff, Inc. initiated this diversity of citizenship action on October 29,1993, alleging breach of contract, tortious interference with contract, fraud, and civil conspiracy against various of the appellees. The action arose out of the termination of three contracts between Dayhoff and appellee Heinz Dolciaria S.p A. involving the manufacture and sale of candies in the United States. The terminations followed the sale of the Heinz Dolciaria candy business to appellee Hershey Foods Corporation. The district court dismissed…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mellon Bank (East) Psfs, National Association v. Kenneth v. Farino Leslie Trinin Robert Levitas Eileen MichaelsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Dayhoff Inc. v. H.J. Heinz Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Amyndas Pharmaceuticals, S.A. v. Zealand Pharma A/SCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- Mauricio Usme v. CMI Leisure Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- ABIRA MEDICAL LABORATORIES, LLC v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MISSOURIDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- AMRES CORPORATION v. MUFFOLETTODistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.