Legal Opinion
United States v. Juan Faulks
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 29, 1998No. 96-2056PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Juan Faulks entered into a plea agreement with the government which required him to cooperate in the investigation of individuals participating in the distribution of narcotics. In return for Faulks’ assistance, the government agreed to file a motion pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 requesting a downward departure from the Sentencing Guidelines. Faulks asserts that the district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines because it granted the government’s motion but, nevertheless, imposed a sentence within the applicable guideline range.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Kikumura, YuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Arthur LiebermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Robert HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. John BairdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Sidney J. Dickler, Richard R. Petrucci. Sidney J. Dickler, in No. 94-3517. Richard R. Petrucci, in No. 94-3518Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Reginald ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Juan FaulksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Vazquez-LebronCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- United States v. FloydCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Scott HashimotoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.